Pointing at SpaceX explosion, ULA says Pentagon contracts shouldn’t just go to lowest bidder

The recent explosion of a SpaceX rocket should raise concerns about going with the lowest bidder on sensitive national security launch contracts, the chief of the United Launch Alliance wrote in a letter to top Pentagon officials this month.

Tory Bruno, ULA’s chief executive, urged the Air Force to postpone the deadline for bids, saying it should take time to explore the impact of SpaceX’s rocket failure while also taking into account both companies’ experience and past performance.

The Pentagon should have particular reservations, Bruno wrote, given that SpaceX has now had two of its Falcon 9 rockets blow up, which he said “serve as a reminder of the complexity and hazards intrinsic to space launch services.”

“This strategy defies both law and logic and puts hundreds of millions of taxpayer dollars and Warfighter mission needs unnecessarily at risk,” he wrote.

The letter is the latest salvo in one of Washington’s most contentious contractor feuds, one that has pitted a pair of the world’s most powerful defense contractors against a brash billionaire looking to shake up a calcified market by offering launches far more cheaply. And it’s the most glaring example yet of a competitor going after SpaceX for its pair of explosions.

JOHN MCCAIN: THE BEST SENATOR TAXPAYER-SUBSIDIZED ELON MUSK CAN BUY

The Senior Senator from Arizona, Republican John McCain, is being investigated by an inspector general for the Department of Defense for inappropriate activities in promoting Elon Musk’s SpaceX over United Launch Alliance (ULA). Having had a long term political relationship with Musk, McCain supported the Congressional ban on the purchase or use of Russian-made RD-180 rocket engines, used by ULA. The Arizona senator used the Russian origin of the rockets as the basis for opposing them, while never raising issue with the other 99.6 percent of about $27 billion in goods imported from Russia.

SpaceX and ULA are the only two companies qualified to bid on the space launch contracts with the U.S. government, and quite conveniently, McCain pushed to ban the Russian-made RD-180 rockets to take ULA out of the bidding process, and by default have the contracts granted to SpaceX. McCain declared it a “big win for competition” when SpaceX won the contracts, but yet in reality he had helped them become the new sole providers of the launch services instead of ULA. Elon Musk’s investments in donating to Sen. McCain and the McCain Institute paid off handsomely in the form of billions in space launch contracts.

McCain has consistently supported SpaceX and Musk’s other companies, while SpaceX has supported legislation proposed by McCain. McCain’s S. 1376 bill titled National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016, received the support of SpaceX, who paid the lobbying firm Squire, Patton and Boggs $90,000 to seek passage of the bill. Congress later passed a different version of legislation, S. 1356, that carried the same title. According to lobbying reports from theCenter For Responsive Politics, In 2015, SpaceX sent $350,000 on lobbying, in part, for legislation that Sen. McCain voted for, includingH.R. 1735, H.R. 2685, H.R. 719, S. 1356, And H.R. 2262. Sen. McCain has received a $5000 donation from SpaceX, while the McCain Institute has received donations from SpaceX and far-left political activist George Soros.

Musk is a “top business leader” according to Sen. McCain, and the senator invited him to speak at the Sedona Forum hosted by the McCain Institute. McCain tweeted about how it was “good to visit with” Musk at his Senate office in Washington D.C. McCain has consistently supported and praised Musk and the three companies he has built with more than $4.9 billion in government subsidies and billions more in contracts awarded from state governments as well the federal government.

While the companies have received about $4.9 billion in government funding, Musk’s enterprises have recently lost more than $3.5 billionin value. This loss in stock value was calculated at about half the value of Musk’s ownership in three companies. Despite the growing financial challenges the companies face, Sen. McCain has remained firmly in support of Musk and his business ventures.

McCain prefers SpaceX to win the government’s launch contracts, but their recent failure record compares quite unfavorably to the stellar launch record of ULA. Along with the spectacular failure of it’s unmanned CRS-7 rocket, which exploded last year, SpaceX also suffered its third disaster earlier this year when it failed to land its Falcon 9 rocket on a drone ship in the sea.

ULA offers the better products, but Sen. McCain is so blindly loyal to Elon Musk that he is attempting to exert his influence for force government launch contracts to be awarded to SpaceX instead. Clearly McCain is bought and paid for by Musk, and is putting his crony relationship with the founder of SpaceX above the public’s interest in having the space launch contracts awarded to the company most suited to winning the contracts. McCain is the best senator Elon Musk can buy.

Elon Musk: The Great Congressional Swindler

This month, SpaceX’s Falcon 9 rocket blew up, destroying Facebook’s $195-million-dollar satellite.

This event eerily reminds us about the failed Falcon 9 launch just 15 months earlier, where SpaceX’s rocket blew up as it approached orbit and destroyed $118 million dollars of NASA cargo. This is the second failure in succession, reminding the public of the “risks of spaceflight.”

Except that “risk of spaceflight” is just rhetoric by the government – the other orbit launching company, United Launch Alliance (ULA), has experienced a 100 percent success rate in launches over a course of 10 years, compared to SpaceX’s reckless six years in business.

SolarCity Raises $305 Million, but There’s a Catch

There are a couple of implications from the new financing announcement. One is that SolarCity’s funding costs are getting higher over time, meaning it’s generating less value for investors. Another is that it’s selling most of the cash flows it will get from customers, meaning there’s less and less upside potential in the future.

The flip side is that SolarCity has been able to get funding for its projects, keeping the company’s operations afloat for now. That’s a positive as SolarCity attempts to be bought out by Tesla Motors and transitions its business from financing leases and power purchase agreements to selling solar systems to customers with third-party financed loans.

The final point may be most important for those looking at the company today. If SolarCity can transition to cash sales or loans, it will generate up-front cash, lessening its reliance on financing transactions. If that’s the case, today’s rising financing costs won’t matter nearly as much as they would otherwise. But that’s a lot for a company like SolarCity to juggle, especially in the middle of a buyout process.

Tesla And SolarCity: The Sting, Part Deux

Summary

ESG investors are gluttons for punishment: false environmental claims on top of dubious accounting.

SolarCity was ahead on “selling the payments” because their value prop was highly dubious. Maybe Tesla will soon learn.

The new Tesla will be neither an energy company nor green.

Tesla’s Elon Musk Buying Over Half of SolarCity Bond Offer

Musk’s purchase of the so-called “solar bonds” comes after money-losing SolarCity last week said it would cut operating costs to bring expenses in line with its reduced solar installation outlook.

SolarCity CEO Lyndon Rive and Chief Technology Officer Peter Rive are each buying another $17.5 million of the $124 million offer, according to the SolarCity filing.

Feds approve $2.6 billion Tesla-SolarCity merger, but stock market says ‘meh’

Meanwhile, SolarCity plans to offer integrated power-generating roofs in addition to the solar-power panels it has been installing on existing structures.

Neither company has yet become fully profitable, and the share prices for both companies trended downward in today’s trading. This week, Musk and other SolarCity executives reported that they purchased tens of millions of dollars worth of bonds issued by the company – a move that CNBC said stirred concerns among some industry observers.

Stop Elon From Failing Again

THE ONE STOP DATABASE ON STOPPING ELON MUSK

cronyism